The birds confronting him look more like the grim and ravenous lapped-faced vultures often seen waiting to swoop onto the kills in South African game reserves.

Zuma is due in the Pietermartizburg High Court on Tuesday.

There he faces charges of corruption, racketeering and money laundering relating to deals he made during  South Africa’s  1999 two-billion-euro arms procurement.

Zuma’s bid to have these charges permanently dropped on grounds that they are politically motivated was finally rejected by the Pietermaritzburg court on Friday.

It was his former counsel Kemp J Kemp who described Zuma’s  years of legal obfuscation and delay as the Stalingrad option, saying they would fight in every room, in every house and  on every street to prevent the prosecution.

That strategy has failed and left Zuma being faced with astronomical legal bills.

The prosecution admits it does not know what to expect tomorrow.

The case has been put down for four days. Zuma might well have yet another delaying mechanism up his sleeve.

Nevertheless they are ready to produce their facts.

They will draw heavily on the successful prosecution 14 years ago of Zuma’s financial advisor Schabir Schaik.

The judge in in that trial, Hillary Squires  declared Schaik and Zuma to have had a generally corrupt relationship.

The mass rallies that have been held outside court every time Zuma appeared in the past 18 months seeking to overturn the prosecution are become smaller.

His supporters loved hearing Zuma speak of being the son of warriors and vow that the knowledge he has  procured  as the ANC intelligence head has given him more than enough ammunition to fend off any legal challenge. 

They are less enthusiastic about recent complaints by Zuma that he is being picked on by the establishment for championing the cause of the poor.

If the case does run for its full four days, judgment could be delayed until next year.

If found guilty, the  seriousness of the charges could see him face as much as 15 years in jail.

The Pietermartizburg trial is only a step along the legal minefield confronting Zuma.      

He is scheduled once again to testify before the state capture commission from October 21 to 25.

Earlier this year he was treated with kid gloves by the commission chair, Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo.

This enabled him simply to deny knowledge of events, stretching credibility beyond breaking point.

He is unlikely to enjoy a repeat of such favorable treatment.

Should he exercise his right to walk out it will provide ammunition to those seeking to prosecute him for activities during his terms as President – particularly with the wealthy Indian Gupta family who are at the very heart of  establishing the state capture commission.   

Zuma is also contesting the Pretoria High Court ruling that he pay back the million euros in court costs entailed in financing the so-called Stalingrad option from the public purse while he was in office.

The post Legal vultures confront disgraced former President Jacob Zuma appeared first on Jean-Jacques Cornish.

Nene categorically  denies allegations by the  far-left Economic Freedom Fighters that he used his relationship with the Guptas to enrich his son and wife.

Nhlanhla Nene is the first South African Cabinet member to appear before the commission of inquiry into state capture headed by Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo.

He says as deputy finance minister  he was invited four times to the home of the wealthy Indian family accused of have an improperly close relationship with former president Jacob Zuma.

Nene corroborated the evidence delivered last month by his deputy Mcebisi Jonas that he has been offered a bribe and  the job of finance minister by the Guptas if he did their bidding.

Nene says things turned sour with Zuma when he refused to approve the purchase of a nuclear power plant from Russia that he believed South Africa did not require and could not afford.

The Gupta brothers owned a uranium mine and wanted to supply the nuclear plant with the strategic mineral.

The post Nhlanhla Nene says Jacob Zuma sacked him because he refused to toe the line appeared first on Jean-Jacques Cornish.